Abdul El-Sayed believes in Medicare for All. He thinks this system should include gender affirming care for children as well as abortion for women. He believes this makes him compassionate. He is wrong. These are some of the most reprehensible policy positions the left has.

He implies that gender affirming care and abortion are both medically necessary procedures. But if this were true, why is it not true?

Firstly, the fact that he claims he is defending medical care for children by condoning gender transitions for minors is deeply deranged. He has proven he could not care less about kids, as shown by his stance on abortion. Not only could he not care less when moms "abort" their unborn children, but he also proves he does not care about them post-birth, as proven by his support for medically unnecessary Frankenstein procedures.So, when he claims Medicare is for all, that means everyone outside of the womb. Glad we cleared that up.

In addition to these asinine takes, he also claimed he is in favor of the government taking control of private property.

"We need some system of public control."

Wow. He even claimed he wants to take it further left than public ownership. He truly is the worst, isn't he?