|
Russia
reality check:
Nuclear First Strike "Many countries shall be embroiled
in wars, until we have the greatest war ever seen, nor shall ever be
seen again, the Third World War, which shall engulf the nations. And
many nations shall disappear from the force of the armaments being
gathered now throughout Russia." "Then
I turned, and lifted up mine eyes, and looked, and behold a flying
roll. And he said unto me, 'What seest thou?' And I answered, 'I see a
flying roll; the length thereof is twenty cubits, and the breadth
thereof ten cubits.'" |
|
Stanislav
Lunev—the highest-ranking GRU (Russian military intelligence) officer ever
to defect from Russia—also warns that Russia is preparing for war against
the United States. Lunev's
book Through the Eyes of the Enemy (published last summer by Regnery)
states categorically that the Cold War is not over and that Russia continues
to plan for a nuclear war. "Russia remains terrified of the power of
America, and Russian military intelligence does everything it can prepare
for a war that it considers inevitable," he wrote. This war, Lunev
details, would employ nuclear, biological and chemical weapons against
America. (Russia
and China Prepare for War -- Part 4: Russia May Launch a Surprise Attack
Against US (Christopher
Ruddy) Colonel
Lunev testified before Congress at the beginning of 2000: Stanislav
Lunev, the highest-ranking Soviet spy ever to defect, warned members of
Congress Monday a pre-emptive nuclear strike by Russia on American soil is a
real possibility.
At a House Committee on Government Reform hearing here, the one-time colonel
in Soviet and then Russian Federation military intelligence, gave a chilling
presentation of his country’s Cold War plans to defeat the United States. (Ex-spy
Fears Sneak Russian Attack, NewsMax.com, January 25, 2000) We must pay close
attention to statements made by Russia’s leader as well: Russia's
new leader has sent a blunt threat to the United States that the Kremlin
will not hesitate to be the first to use nuclear weapons.
The new
security doctrine announced over the weekend by Acting President Vladimir V.
Putin replaces one from 1997 that Russia would not use nuclear weapons
unless its national sovereignty were threatened. (Putin
Warns Russia Will Strike First NewsMax.com, January 17, 2000)
According
to [Peter Vincent] Pry, "Soviet military textbooks written in the
1960s, 1970s, and 1980s generally endorsed the view that nuclear war could
be won and that victory was likely to go to the side that struck
first." (Surprise
Nuclear Attack, Part 1, J.R. Nyquist) A very
informative Soviet military journal is discussed in the booklet, Soviet
Strategy for Nuclear War, by Joseph D. Douglass, Jr. and Amoretta M.
Hoeber: “Special
attention was also directed to the Soviet journal Voyennaya mysl.
This journal is the official military-theoretical organ of the Soviet
Ministry of Defense and is also regarded as the official organ of the Soviet
General Staff. It is a restricted or classified journal, written for senior
officers of the Soviet armed forces, and is not usually available to Western
analysts. [It was information from selected top secret issues of this
journal that are referred to as the Special Collection on the New
Soviet Military Doctrine that was passed to the West by Colonel Oleg
V. Penkovskiy in the early sixties prior to his arrest by Soviet KGB agents
in October, 1962].” [i] Within
the journal Voyennaya mysl we discover a clear and appalling Russian
war strategy. Winnable
nuclear war? “Although
such a war would clearly involve enormous destruction, in the Soviet view it
would not be the end of the world. Nations could recover, especially the
Soviet Union. Moreover, despite the unprecedented destruction, the war is
viewed as winnable. Preparing to fight and win this war is the most
important task of Soviet military strategy.” [ii] This
subject is covered in many Russian publications: “In
contrast to much of Western military literature, the Soviet literature is
seriously directed to the problems of fighting and winning a nuclear war.
Moreover, we discovered no evidence of the existence of opposing schools of
thought as are found in the West. The Soviet literature is extremely
consistent; different categories of sources (e.g., journals and textbooks)
agree and, except for occasional, gradual developments in basic themes, are
consistent over time. This consistency prompted us to reconstruct the basic
themes of Soviet thought on world nuclear war.” [iii] In
fact, waging and winning a nuclear war has been considered the main task of
the Soviet military: “The
Soviet government… and their armed forces must be ready primarily for a
world war…. The Armed Forces of the Soviet Union and the other socialist
countries must be prepared above all to wage war under conditions of the
mass use of nuclear weapons by both belligerent parties…. The preparation
and waging of just such a war must be regarded as the main task of
the theory of military strategy and strategic leadership.” [iv] In
preparation for this horrendous day, the Russian military has expended great
efforts to bring about circumstances “favorable” to a nuclear first
strike victory: “A
major portion of Soviet military strategy is geared to understanding the
favorable circumstances under which nuclear war can be won by the Soviet
Union and to effecting these circumstances. This is the principal subject of
the Soviet text, The People, the Army, the Commander. Although the
title suggests an ideological treatise on the unity of the Soviet people and
their leadership, the book is in fact an examination of global nuclear war
and the political, economic, moral, administrative, and leadership factors
that, according to the author, would bring victory in such a war.” [v] Obviously,
a weakened opponent (U.S.) is a key “favorable” condition for winning
such a war. United States air and ground strength have shrunk by two-thirds
since 1985, and the scraping of the U.S. military during the eight-year
reign of Clinton has greatly widened U.S.-Russian military parity. Such
conditions are exactly what Russia has wished for: “…
the Soviets place great importance on seizing the initiative and striking
first, with surprise if at all possible.
The main objectives of such a strike would be to destroy the capability of
the United States to organize a strong counterstrike; to achieve a
preponderance of residual nuclear power; and, if that does not end the war,
to intensify the effort to destroy the total military-economic potential of
the United States. And, essential to this process is the need to get the
United States to forego any military buildup that would deny the Soviets the
possibility of achieving this relative capability—hence, the importance
of selling to the West an image of the Soviet Union that encourages U.S.
inaction.” [vi] Russian
war games Today,
Russia may be conducting nuclear deception on a far vaster scale beneath
Yamantau Mountain, where it has dug out a gigantic underground military
complex designed to withstand a sustained nuclear assault. U.S. intelligence
sources tell WorldNetDaily that the Yamantau complex is but one of some 200
secret deep underground nuclear war-fighting sites in Russia, many of which
have been significantly upgraded over the past six years at a cost of
billions of dollars. Since the end of the Cold War in 1991, U.S.
intelligence sources believe the Russian government has pumped more than $6
billion into Yamantau alone, to construct a sprawling underground complex
that spans an area as large as Washington, D.C., inside the Beltway—some
400 square miles…. The work at the Yamantau complex is only part of
Russia's current efforts to modernize and reinforce some 200 deep
underground command posts, nuclear warhead repositories and clandestine
missile sites. Some CIA and Joint Chiefs of Staff analysts believe these
assets will give Russia a strategic advantage over the U.S. in the event of
nuclear war. (Can
Moscow Be Trusted: Inside Russia's Magic Mountain - Part II,
WorldNet Daily) To expend such monumental resources for
a facility that has but one purpose, waging a nuclear war, is clear evidence
that the war strategy outlined in the journal Voyennaya mysl
is for real. We must
also note that Russian war games conducted over the last few years have been
unprecedented in magnitude: ·
February 21, 1997—Prime
Minister Victor Chernomyrdin “was at the [Russian] Odinstovo nuclear
command center, overseeing an exercise whose assignment was ‘to destroy
the U.S. in less than an hour.’” ·
September 1997—Three
day exercise, included test firing ICBMs, submarine-launched missiles, and
bomber-launched cruise missiles. · April 1998—Russia’s
strategic bomber forces carried out simulated nuclear bombing raids against
the United States in an exercise that included test firings of long-range
cruise missiles. · October 1998—Russia’s
strategic rocket forces practiced a mock nuclear attack, firing an ICBM at
the U.S., coordinated with the Russian strategic bomber force. ·
June
21, 1999—Russia
began gigantic war exercises last Monday [June 21]. Troops from three
military districts and the powerful Northern Fleet, together with Russia's
Air Defense Forces, maneuvered to evade imaginary Western air and missile
strikes. Then on Saturday, Russia's forces turned to launch a mock counter
strike. In recent months, preparing for a future nuclear war has been a top
priority with the Russian General Staff, which believes such a war is not
only possible, but inevitable. Books and articles spelling out the
techniques of thermonuclear world war continue to be regarded as classics in
Russia's war colleges. The theory and practice of nuclear war did not die
with the Soviet Union. Demonstrating this emphasis on nuclear war, an
unprecedented number of Russian war games have taken place in the last year
and a half. The frequency and size of these war games dramatically increased
after NATO began bombing Serbia on March 24. As the crisis over Kosovo
heated up, not only did Russia's leaders make veiled threats about the
possibility of nuclear war, but Russian soldiers, sailors, and airmen were
being trained to fight and win such a war. Some in the West would argue that
Russia's training methods are a bluff. But there is a good reason to think
otherwise. (Russia's
nuclear war-games , Monday, June 28, 1999 by J.R. Nyquist) · August 16, 2000—Russia and Belarus recently held massive war games meant to "make NATO strategists think twice about the dangerous consequences" of moving eastward. Moscow characterized the exercises, called "Combat Unity 2000," as unprecedented in their magnitude, taking place "for the first time ever ... on such a scale."… Ukraine, which participated in NATO exercises in June, will join Russia, Belarus and eight other CIS members in another set of military exercises at the end of this month. (Russia holding big war games , Wednesday, August 16, 2000 by I. J. Toby Westerman)
"O
My children of the United States, do you not understand what is ahead for
you? Your country, the United States, has not known what it is to suffer
through destructive forces. My children, you shall not escape the
destruction that the Bear of communism has set upon many countries in Europe
and the world. You cannot compromise your Faith to save what there is left,
for everything upon earth shall fall as rubble with the Chastisement. A ball
of fire, a chastisement, a baptism of fire, is heading for mankind. Can you
not understand?" Our
Lady -
"You ask Me, My child, why My tears are flowing?
Come with Me and look!" [i]
Joseph D. Douglass, Jr. and Amoretta M. Hoeber, Soviet Strategy for
Nuclear War, p. 4. Directives from Heaven: #10 - Consecrate Russia #57
- World
War III Chastisement (Part I) #101
- Russia
and China, Part 1 External
Links:
Home | Introduction | Prophecies | Directives | Order Form | Testimonies | Veronica | News | Photos | Bible | Magazine | Newsletters | Radio Show | The electronic form of this
document is copyrighted. |
