| 
     Who helped negotiate
    America's diplomatic defeat in Vietnam and Ian Smith's defeat in Rhodesia in
    1976? Henry Kissinger. Several years ago he was invited to South
    Africa to negotiate differences between the Zulus and the Marxist ANC.
    Donald McAlvany warns, "Watch out! When Kissinger negotiates, the
    communists always win!" (McAlvany Intelligence Adviser,
    April 1994, p. 14) 
    Henry
    Kissinger 
	The very day after the Tiananmen
    Square massacre in China, Kissinger's syndicated column referred to Deng
    Xiaoping (China's leader) as "one of the great reformers in Chinese
    history" and a man "who chose a more humane and less
    chaotic course" [1] for China.  Though he later expressed
    shock at the "brutality" of the crackdown, the general trend of
    his statements have been to find excuses for the Chinese authorities.  
         According to Bill Gertz, "Kissinger played the
    key role in secret talks during the 1970s that led President Nixon to
    establish informal ties with China in 1972 and ultimately led to formal
    diplomatic relations in 1979..." (The China Threat, Bill Gertz,
    p. 44) 
         In a single year, Kissinger may go to China several
    times, and the door is always open to him. In September 1990, Kissinger met
    with Li Peng, the man considered to be most directly responsible for
    ordering the Tiananmen massacre, who gave Kissinger and his wife a banquet
    complete with warm mutual toasts. The next day, Kissinger when to see Jiang
    Zemin, who noted that Kissinger was making his eighteenth visit to the
    People's Republic of China. 
         Kissinger's views of China, incidentally, are
    almost identical to the view put force in public statements by communist
    Chinese leaders themselves.  
         Many American corporations seeking to do business
    with China pay Kissinger large sums of money at least in part because of his
    unparalleled access to China's most powerful figures. As Senator Scott
    Thompson stated before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, "The
    fact is that [Kissinger] does receive substantial remuneration from
    corporations with major investments in China, which stood to benefit from
    adoption of his positions." (U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Hearings
    on U.S. Policy Toward China, February 13, 1990) 
         On September 12, 1989, John J. Fialka of the Wall
    Street Journal accused Kissinger that his business dealings with China
    represented a conflict of interest with the United States. From this and
    other criticism, Kissinger became defensive and called any linking of his
    views on China with his business interests a form of
    "McCarthyism." Actually, some Americans were beginning to see dark
    shades of a traitor in Kissinger.  
         Joseph Farah of WorldNetDaily accuses
    Kissinger of being well-paid by the Chinese for his public relations
    services: 
    
      I'll tell
      you who I think should be in jail for selling out American security
      interests in favor of their own pocketbooks--Henry
      [Kissinger] the K and Al Haig. At the very least, they should be
      required to register as paid foreign lobbyists and identified as such each
      and every time they appear on television and radio as sober and
      dispassionate commentators on the world scene. (The
      'establishment' knows best, April 7, 1999 by Joseph Farah) 
     
    It is interesting to
    note that Kissinger's one-time Jewish aide, Morton Halperin, is seriously
    considered by many people to be a communist agent: 
    
      Halperin, according to a well-respected
      former State official, was suspected of working for the communists in the
      '60s and '70s. "He was a person we knew to be pro-Soviet and not a
      person to be trusted," said the official, who worked in intelligence
      during the height of the Cold War. 
           "Halperin has been known on embassy
      (briefing) cards as a Soviet or communist agent," added the official,
      who was an expert on the Soviet Union, in an exclusive interview with
      WorldNetDaily. 
          A Democrat-controlled Senate denied Halperin
      confirmation as President Clinton's nominee as assistant secretary of
      defense in large part because of his radical leftist views. His current
      post did not require confirmation. Books have linked Halperin to the
      KGB.... 
           From 1975 to 1992, he headed the Center for
      National Security Studies in Washington. CNSS is a spinoff of the
      Institute for Policy Studies, a pro-Marxist think tank that has supported
      Soviet and Cuban operations in Third World countries. (To
      Russia with love? Friday, May 19, 2000 by Paul Sperry) 
     
         Unknown to
    most people, and really only known through Our Lady of the Roses message,
    the worldwide Warning would have occurred on December 28, 1973, followed by
    the great War. But a reprieve was granted to the world, because of mankind's
    prayerful response. In other words, the Yom Kippur War would have evolved
    into World War III, were it not for the mercy of God. This is easy to
    imagine when we realize how close the Yom Kippur War came to nuclear war: 
    
      In 1973, Syria launched
      the latest of a series of full-scale wars on Israel -- a sneak attack on
      the Jewish holy day of Yom Kippur. Most analysts agree that had Syria held
      that high ground prior to the invasion, there would have been no stopping
      the onslaught. As it was, the Israelis very nearly lost the war. Defeat
      was so close that Defense Minister Moshe Dayan and Prime Minister Golda
      Meir armed the "doomsday weapon"
      -- Israel's limited strategic
      nuclear arsenal. (The
      Mideast 'peace' talks, January 6, 2000 by Joseph Farah) 
     
    The Yom Kippur
    War 
	It is very interesting that Our Lady of the Roses provided this 
	vision of Kissinger and the Russians planning a war in May 1973, when the 
	Yom Kippur War was still four months into the future, to begin on October 6, 
	1973. 
         Following
    a cease-fire, the Yom Kippur War officially ended on October 22, 1973 but
    fighting continued on the Egyptian-Israeli front and the U.S. and the Soviet
    Union were nearly dragged into a full-scale superpower confrontation.
    Various articles illustrate just how close the world came to a major
    catastrophe: 
    
      As Israel, a U.S. ally,
      met Syria and Egypt, Soviet client states, on the battlefield,
      policymakers in Washington and Moscow jockeyed for position. For a few
      hours, Washington and Moscow both weighed the possibility of a direct
      confrontation between the superpowers. The United States put its forces on
      nuclear alert after the Soviet Union threatened to dispatch troops to
      defend Egypt. (Yom
      Kippur War changed US-Israel ties, Matthew Dorf) 
      The
      initial days of the war were disastrous for Israel: it lost over 150
      planes and its counter-attacks failed. But then Israel reversed its
      losses, repelling the Syrians back into Syria itself, reaching within 12
      miles of Damascus. 
           Seeing
      the invasion faltering, the Soviet Union sent massive shipments of
      supplies to assist Syria and Egypt and in response, the U.S. did the same
      for Israel. 
           Meanwhile,
      Israeli forces led by Ariel Sharon beat back the Egyptian advance in the
      south, crossed the canal and surrounded the Egyptian Third Army. With
      Israel poised to wipe out Egypt's troops or storm Damascus, U.S. Secretary
      of State Henry Kissinger went to Moscow to negotiate a cease-fire
      agreement. 
           The
      agreement reached in Moscow called for cessation of hostilities within 24
      hours. But soon the USSR claimed Israel was breaking its terms by planning
      to move against the trapped Egyptian troops. Only when the Soviet Union
      threatened to intervene, and the U.S. pressed Israel to back off, did the
      cease fire take effect on Oct. 25.  (CBS.com--The
      Yom Kippur War) 
      Naturally, the war involved global as well
      as regional politics. The USSR had actively supported the Arab cause and
      on the third day of fighting (9 October) it called upon various Afro-Arab
      states to fully support Egypt and Syria. Also at that time, the USSR
      instituted a massive air operation to re-supply Egypt and Syria with
      military equipment. Soviet naval maneuvers and public statements of Soviet
      officials helped to develop an impression that the USSR might intervene
      even more actively. After several days of fighting, with Israel becoming
      increasingly dominant, US Secretary of State Kissinger visited Moscow
      on 20 October to discuss the conflict in response to an urgent request
      from Soviet First Secretary Brezhnev. Following these discussions, the
      superpowers cooperated in convoking a meeting of the UN Security Council,
      which passed their joint resolution calling for a cease-fire, negotiations
      among the parties, and implementation of Resolution 242 (see Case269:
      Arab-Israeli Confrontation, 1967-1973). The superpowers pressured their
      client states to accept the resolution's provisions. 
           Although
      formally accepting the cease-fire, Israel continued to improve its
      military position on the west bank of the Canal, effectively isolating the
      Egyptian forces on the east bank. For unclear motives, the USSR
      engaged in a series of military and diplomatic actions that US President
      Nixon's administration saw as being quite provocative; refusing a
      Soviet plan for the superpowers to police a truce in the Middle East with
      their own force and concerned that the USSR would unilaterally intervene
      with strong military forces, on 25 October the US placed its forces on
      world-wide military alert. A new Soviet-American agreement was quickly
      reached; The Security Council reaffirmed its call for a cease-fire and
      recreated the United Nations Emergency Force (UNEF: seeCase119: Suez War,
      1956-1957) to supervise it. Furthermore, the five permanent Council
      members were prohibited from participating in a peacekeeping force in the
      area. The US military alert was then gradually lifted. On the same day,
      the USSR told the US that it would act to relieve the surrounded Egyptian
      force with Soviet forces unless Israel permitted Egyptian supplies to be
      provided; the US thereupon pressured Israel to return to the 22 October
      lines, but this pressure was resisted. A visit by Kissinger to Egypt,
      however, broke the impasse, and on 11 November Israeli and Egyptian
      military commanders signed an agreement for negotiating a withdrawal to
      their earlier positions and for the relief of the isolated Egyptian
      troops. (Dis73a03
      Yom Kippur War, USC University) 
      On 13 October the watchful Israeli
      commanders finally observed large-scale movement in the congested Egyptian
      bridgehead, as the powerful armored divisions, the 21st in the 2nd Army
      and the 4th in the 3rd Army sectors, crossed from the west bank into
      jump-off positions for an attack. Bracing themselves for the armored
      onslaught, the Israeli tankers took up defensive positions on 
	   the high
      ground, facing the approaches from which they anticipated the Egyptian
      attack. 
      Facing the Israelis were some 1200 modern Soviet tanks
      massed in attack formation interspersed with infantry on APCs and trucks
      carrying anti-tank missiles and heavy concentrations of artillery. Though
      cautious, the Egyptians were confident. And from their recent experiences
      with the Israeli forces they had no reason not to be. 
           It should
      be mentioned that the Israeli troops that managed to sneak around and get
      into the Egyptian city of Suez on the western bank of the canal was
      completely surrounded by Egyptian heavy artillery and tanks and completely
      paralyzed. Later, the United States and the United Soviet Socialist
      Republics convinced the Egyptian leader Anwar Elsadat that demolishing
      that part of the Israeli army would start a third world war, thus,
      the Egyptians allowed the Israeli infiltrating troops to retreat towards
      the Sinai peninsula. (Kamal Hasan Ali, The Roads of Life --  El-Shorouk
      Publishing house, Cairo, 1994. Article by Mohammad
      Tawfik, October 2, 2000) 
     
    The
    tide of the war began to turn on October 10.  The Syrians were pushed
    back and Israel advanced into Syria proper.  The Soviet Union responded
    by sending airlifts to Damascus and Cairo, which were answered on October 12
    and 13 by massive US airlifts to Israel.  Israeli forces crossed the
    Suez Canal and surrounded the Egyptian Third Army on October 21. 
         The war
    started an international crisis when the Soviet Union responded to a plea
    from Egypt to save its Third Army by threatening to send troops to assist
    Egypt.  Henry Kissinger, the US Secretary of State, went to Moscow
    to negotiate a cease-fire.  The result was UN Resolution 338, an
    immediate cease-fire that reinstated Resolution 242, which "aimed at
    establishing a just and durable peace in the Middle East".  This
    cease-fire was broken and again the Soviets threatened to intervene. 
    However, the US pressured Israel into accepting a second cease-fire on
    October 25, 1973.  The war was over, and both Israel and Egypt claimed
    victory. (The Yom Kippur War, North Park University) 
    References: 
    [1] Henry A. Kissinger, "For China,
    Economic Reforms Spark Eruptions," [Los Angeles] Times, July 30,
    1989. 
    
          
     
    
       
     
    Directives
    from Heaven: 
    
    
#10 - Consecrate Russia 
#57 - The Great World War III Chastisement (Part I) 
#58 - The Great World War III Chastisement (Part II) 
#59 - The Great World War III Chastisement (Part III) 
#101 - Russia and China, Part 1  
#102 - Russia and China, Part 2  
#103 - Communism 
#104 - Invasion 
 
    Bayside
    Prophecies: 
    
      June 18, 1992 -- Communism death;
      a ruse. (click
      here) 
      October 2, 1987
      - Consecrate Russia, or else... (click
      here)  April 14, 1984 -- Do not take lightly the
      reports of ships out on the sea and submarines... (click
      here) 
      June 18, 1984 -- You are surrounded now by reconnaissance
      planes and also by missiles (click
      here) 
      March 26, 1983 -- Russia plans to invade the United
      States with missiles (click
      here) 
      May 28, 1983 - The Third World War...  (click
      here) 
      November 20, 1978 --
      ...Pray for your new Pope. He must be given the strength
      even unto the point of martyrdom if necessary. He must not allow Communism
      to control Rome. (click
      here) 
     
    External Links: 
    
      The
      'establishment' knows best  April 7, 1999 by Joseph Farah 
      To
      Russia with love? May 19, 2000 by Paul Sperry 
      The
      Perestroika Deception 
      Ex-spy
      Fears Sneak Russian Attack (NewsMax.com, January 25, 2000) 
		
		Russia and
      China: An Anti-American Alliance (NewsMax.com, July 19, 2000) 
		
		Russia Arming
      Chinese Navy Against U.S. (NewsMax.com, July 12, 2000) 
      Surprise
      Nuclear Attack, Part 1, J.R. Nyquist (WorldNetDaily) 
      Surprise
      Nuclear Attack, Part 2, J.R. Nyquist (WorldNetDaily) 
      Russia's
      Economic Moves and What They Portend, J.R. Nyquist (WorldNetDaily) 
      A
      Genuine Threat of War? J.R. Nyquist (WorldNetDaily) 
      Russian
      Threats: Then and Now - Introduction (WorldNetDaily) 
      Can
      Moscow Be Trusted? Russia's Hidden Nuclear Missiles - Part I (WorldNetDaily) 
      Can
      Moscow Be Trusted? Inside Russia's Magic Mountain - Part II (WorldNetDaily) 
      High
      Anxiety, J.R. Nyquist (WorldNetDaily) 
      Ex-spy
      Fears Sneak Russian Attack. Newsmax.com, January 25, 2000 
      China
      Reveals Nuclear War Plans Against U.S. (UPI, March 20, 2000) 
      Russia
      and China Prepare for War -- Part 1 (Christopher Ruddy) 
      Russia
      and China Prepare for War -- Part 2: Clinton's Sell-Out of America: (Christopher
      Ruddy) 
      Russia
      and China Prepare for War -- Part 3: Russia and China -- Our Friends? (Christopher
      Ruddy) 
      Russia
      and China Prepare for War -- Part 4: Russia May Launch a Surprise
      Attack Against US (Christopher
      Ruddy) 
      Russia
      and China Prepare for War -- Part 5: Russia’s Recent Military Build-up (Christopher
      Ruddy)  
      Russia
      and China Prepare for War -- Part 6: Eleven Signs of a Russian Surprise
      Attack (Christopher
      Ruddy) 
      Russia
      and China Prepare for War -- Part 7: United States is Unprepared for War (Christopher
      Ruddy) 
      Russia
      and China Prepare for War -- Part 8: Why are Most Americans Oblivious to
      These Terrifying Facts? (Christopher
      Ruddy) 
     
    
	My gift to help spread Our Lady of the Roses' messages to the world.  
		
	 
   | Home - Latest News |
Introduction | 
Bayside Prophecies | Directives from 
Heaven | Order Form |
Miracles & Cures |
Veronica Lueken |
Miraculous Photos |
Bible | 
Radio Program |
Bayside Videos | 
We encourage 
everyone to print or email copies of this web page to all the Bishops and all 
the clergy.  Also, email or send this web page to the news media and as many 
people as possible. 
The electronic form of this document is copyrighted. 
Quotations are permissible as long as this web site is acknowledged with a 
hyperlink to: 
https://www.tldm.org 
Copyright © These Last Days Ministries, Inc. 1996 - 2020   All rights 
reserved. 
P.O. Box 40                   
616-698-6448 
Lowell, MI 49331-0040 
Revised: July 25, 2022 
     |